It looks like I’ll be finished reading Denis Walsh’s Evidence-based Care in Normal Labour and Birthing
soon. I’ve really enjoyed it.
One thing I really like about this book is the underlying theme of using common sense to return to normal labor and birth. The author seems to come back to this idea at least once in each chapter, but I think it is best displayed in the argument surrounding the following topic: Movement in Labor and Birth.
Why is it that we seem to need randomized clinical trials to show us that moving and using gravity in upright positions would be good for birthing?
I was really struck when I was reading about this concept. Well, duh. Of course, even those promoting natural birth do forget about this. We try and try to prove that this works, but why is that we must prove something so common sense? Are we that far away from good birthing practices?
Quite simply: Yes. [insert a number of choice words]
As a culture, we have truly become a nation that absolutely relies on medical intervention. It’s pervasive. We go to the doctor with flu symptoms and find ourselves getting chest x-rays, bloodwork, and antibiotics (Let’s not forget that the flu is a virus. Antibiotics are for bacterial infections, not viruses). Our child gets a bad bump on the soccer field, and he’s in the ER for a CT scan (see this article).
Recently, we took my son to the doctor (not our pediatrician), for a suspected ear infection. Fortunately, he didn’t have one, but the doctor offered us a prescription for something just in case. When I declined, he replied that was fine, and that he offered because some people feel unsatisfied if they come to the doctor and don’t get something, even if nothing is wrong.
Novel idea, I know, but if you’re not sick, you don’t need something.
And this is much of what Walsh is arguing. If not sick, which pregnancy and labor should never be considered pathologies, then why are we doing randomized clinical trials to prove that natural labor needs natural things? (The same argument can then made against IVs, routine AROM, monitoring…)
I’m not making a new argument of course. I’m simply reiterating what many are already saying.
Pregnancy, labor and birth are normal the vast majority of the time. They require normal, common sense things. If they cease being so, then we’ll call for something else. Don’t do anything just to say that you’ve done something.
soon. I’ve really enjoyed it.One thing I really like about this book is the underlying theme of using common sense to return to normal labor and birth. The author seems to come back to this idea at least once in each chapter, but I think it is best displayed in the argument surrounding the following topic: Movement in Labor and Birth.
Why is it that we seem to need randomized clinical trials to show us that moving and using gravity in upright positions would be good for birthing?
I was really struck when I was reading about this concept. Well, duh. Of course, even those promoting natural birth do forget about this. We try and try to prove that this works, but why is that we must prove something so common sense? Are we that far away from good birthing practices?
Quite simply: Yes. [insert a number of choice words]
As a culture, we have truly become a nation that absolutely relies on medical intervention. It’s pervasive. We go to the doctor with flu symptoms and find ourselves getting chest x-rays, bloodwork, and antibiotics (Let’s not forget that the flu is a virus. Antibiotics are for bacterial infections, not viruses). Our child gets a bad bump on the soccer field, and he’s in the ER for a CT scan (see this article).
Recently, we took my son to the doctor (not our pediatrician), for a suspected ear infection. Fortunately, he didn’t have one, but the doctor offered us a prescription for something just in case. When I declined, he replied that was fine, and that he offered because some people feel unsatisfied if they come to the doctor and don’t get something, even if nothing is wrong.
Novel idea, I know, but if you’re not sick, you don’t need something.
And this is much of what Walsh is arguing. If not sick, which pregnancy and labor should never be considered pathologies, then why are we doing randomized clinical trials to prove that natural labor needs natural things? (The same argument can then made against IVs, routine AROM, monitoring…)
I’m not making a new argument of course. I’m simply reiterating what many are already saying.
Pregnancy, labor and birth are normal the vast majority of the time. They require normal, common sense things. If they cease being so, then we’ll call for something else. Don’t do anything just to say that you’ve done something.
No comments:
Post a Comment